라 비타 에 벨라

a. Explain why you agree or disagree with the Cognitive Approach.

I disagree with the cognitive approach. this approach was derived from not learners but researchers' lab, which makes me feel like this approach is not interested in learners as a human being. Most researchers were not teachers at that time, they must not have known about the real teaching and learning circumstances. If a student makes some grammar errors, what a teacher has to do is just to teach the rule of grammar. If the errors are repetitive, the teacher teaches the rules repetitively! From this point of view, if you can make your students practice language rules repeatedly, you don't need a teacher's teaching skills, and it seems that anyone can teach. This view overlooks the fact that in real-life classrooms the teacher's energetic energy, thorough class strategy, and a motivational word have a great influence on learning.

b. Explain why you agree or disagree with the Affective Humanistic Approach.

I agree with the affective humanistic approach. unfortunately, my students are not young enough to have enough time to learn from using this approach, but if my class consists of younger learners, I will apply this strategy in full measure to my class. I have had many experiences of not being able to speak English properly because of the fear of mistakes. It seems the most natural and ideal way to provide the learner with the most comfortable environment possible and not to be afraid of making mistakes, which leads to immerse himself comfortably in language learning. It will require more time and effort from teachers to prepare for aromas, music, art, and various activities, but from a learner's point of view, it seems that he can learn the language joyfully without stress. Can there be anyone who doesn't want to learn in this way?

c. What techniques can you apply in your classroom that align with your preferred approach?

I can apply the positive reinforcement technique in my class. In fact, I often meet students who hate making mistakes, and I don't get surprised, irritated, or upset when they are wrong. When students' mistakes were treated as if they were not a big deal, the students became more tolerant of their mistakes and were more comfortable with speaking a language that they were learning. Also, I can apply the multiple concerts technique, too. I think this technique is good for improving listening skills, English writing, and grammar skills altogether naturally.

Affective-human approach의 techniques

Positive reinforcement

긍정적 강화를 통해 학습자로 하여금 틀려도 되는 '리스크'를 기꺼이 감수하도록 하고

편안함을 통해 실수를 두려워하지 않도록 만든다.

그렇게 함으로써 학습자는 두려움 없이 언어 학습에 몰두할 수 있게 된다. 

multiple concerts (multiple reading)

학습할 리딩 지문이 주어지면 첫번째는 클래식 음악의 리듬과 억양처럼 연습

두번째는 보통 속도로 대화문을 듣고 그 후 필기하도록 지도

세번째는 필기한 것의 개요를 완성하도록 지도

-> 한번에 다 알아듣지 않아도 되며 반복적인 노력으로 학습이 이루어질 수 있음을 암시 

dramatization

모든 학습자가 남들 앞에서 역할극 하는 것을 좋아하는 것이 아니므로

한 팀은 스크립트 짜기, 한 팀은 공연하기 식으로 역할을 분담하는 것도 한가지 아이디어.