라 비타 에 벨라

넷플릭스로 영한자막 깔고 영어공부하기. 

넷플릭스로 다중언어자막 이용하기

요즘은 와챠, 넷플릭스 뭐 요런걸로 문화생활 많이들 하시죠. 

저도 이 두 가지 다 가입해서 쓰고 있는데 넷플릭스로 영한자막 동시에 보면서 공부하는 기능을 알게 되어서 소개해드립니다.

크롬 웹스토어에 들어가서

Language Learning with Netflix 라는 확장프로그램을 깝니다.

이미 사용자수가 어마무시하네요. 이리 좋은 걸 나만 몰랐어 ㅜㅜㅜ

캡쳐를 하니 저작권 문제로 화면은 저렇게 흑색으로 보이지만 실제로는 잘 나와요.

영어자막, 한글자막 다 나오고

오른쪽에 영어자막만 구간별로 나와서 클릭해서 돌아갈 수 있구요.

A S D 키, 또는 방향키로 구간 이동 가능하고 심지어 대본 카피도 가능합니다!

완전 신세계 ㅜㅜ

옛날부터 이런 툴이 있었다면 진작에 바이링구얼 되었을지도요. 

완전 강추강추하는 확장프로그램입니다!!

The communicative Approach (1970-1980)

people were encountering situations where they needed to speak a foreign language more frequently for work or for travel. 

These people didn't have the luxury of time required by the comprehension approach. 

And needed to learn to communicate effectively in the target language.

왜 언어를 배우는 가 - language is a way to get to know different people.  I can communicate with you and 

learn more about you. it's all about connecting people together. Language is a portal, it's a gateway. 

It's a way to understand someone and create a global society of friends. 

어떻게 가르치나 - being always interested in using new strategies and new techniques. To love to stay up on the latest in technology and teacher strategy. 

To read a lot of blogs and even a few journals to make sure my techniques are well accepted. 

A teacher should make learning fun and interesting. the teacher can use games, high interest topics, 

field trips, mobile devices, and websites. 

Whatever it takes to keep students engaged and interacting in the language. 

Teachers need to know about lots of different things as well. 

This gives teachers using this approach a lot of freedom in what they do in the classroom and how they help their students acquire language.

Gamification and fun techniques have become a staple of the communicative approach.

단점 - the communicative approach is so broad that perhaps, one of its biggest problems is that no one can definitively say, what it's techniques and practices are? Furthermore, there is so much information today that it is hard to know where to look. And yet one more difficulty is that teachers are given not only many different strategies, but many different groups with different purposes, different learning styles and teachers are expected to be experts of all of these different contexts. So some people feel the communicative approach really doesn't have clear boundaries. 

Authentic materials

teachers in the communicative approach try to make the language practice in the classroom as close to the real world as possible.

Sequencing activities

To help learners understand and use the communication cues, teachers give students dialogues or paragraphs with the sentences mixed up. And have them put the sentences or utterances back in the correct order

language games

information gap

role plays

a. Explain why you agree or disagree with the Cognitive Approach.

I disagree with the cognitive approach. this approach was derived from not learners but researchers' lab, which makes me feel like this approach is not interested in learners as a human being. Most researchers were not teachers at that time, they must not have known about the real teaching and learning circumstances. If a student makes some grammar errors, what a teacher has to do is just to teach the rule of grammar. If the errors are repetitive, the teacher teaches the rules repetitively! From this point of view, if you can make your students practice language rules repeatedly, you don't need a teacher's teaching skills, and it seems that anyone can teach. This view overlooks the fact that in real-life classrooms the teacher's energetic energy, thorough class strategy, and a motivational word have a great influence on learning.

b. Explain why you agree or disagree with the Affective Humanistic Approach.

I agree with the affective humanistic approach. unfortunately, my students are not young enough to have enough time to learn from using this approach, but if my class consists of younger learners, I will apply this strategy in full measure to my class. I have had many experiences of not being able to speak English properly because of the fear of mistakes. It seems the most natural and ideal way to provide the learner with the most comfortable environment possible and not to be afraid of making mistakes, which leads to immerse himself comfortably in language learning. It will require more time and effort from teachers to prepare for aromas, music, art, and various activities, but from a learner's point of view, it seems that he can learn the language joyfully without stress. Can there be anyone who doesn't want to learn in this way?

c. What techniques can you apply in your classroom that align with your preferred approach?

I can apply the positive reinforcement technique in my class. In fact, I often meet students who hate making mistakes, and I don't get surprised, irritated, or upset when they are wrong. When students' mistakes were treated as if they were not a big deal, the students became more tolerant of their mistakes and were more comfortable with speaking a language that they were learning. Also, I can apply the multiple concerts technique, too. I think this technique is good for improving listening skills, English writing, and grammar skills altogether naturally.

a. Discuss the differences between the Grammar Translation Approach and the Direct Approach.

The target learners are young men in wealthy families in the Grammar translation approach, but anyone who wants to know another culture in the world can be a learner in the direct approach. The former approach puts importance on the great books in Latin and Greek, but the latter approach puts importance on being immersed in daily activities like a baby learning his or her mother tongue. Teachers who favor the grammar-translation approach make students translate a book into the students’ first language and translate it back to the original language the students are learning. On the other hand, teachers who prefer the direct approach let the learners play a leading role in their learning progress with a variety of verbal exposures. The grammar-translation approach places more emphasis on writing and reading than on speaking and listening, but the direct approach emphasizes speaking and listening.

b. Which approach most closely aligns with your current teaching style?

The grammar-translation approach closely aligns with my current teaching style. I think the direct approach is more desirable for learners aged under 12 than the grammar-translation approach. The students in my class are between 13 and 19 years old, so their reading comprehension ability and writing skills are very important in their school curriculum. the techniques derived from the grammar-translation approach are very useful when I teach my students. Especially reading comprehension questions and filling in the blanks and writing compositions help my students get a better grade in their exams.

영어수업에 쓰면 유용한 액티비티 & 게임 Pictionary

실제로 수업에 활용했을 때 

게임, 액티비티마다 아이들의 열광의 정도가 다 다른데요.

이 Pictionary 게임은 아이들의 깔깔깔 소리가 끊이지 않는 즐거운 게임이에요. 

아이들은 이 게임을 통해 창의성을 키울 수 있고

조금 연령이 높은 클래스에서도 마치 공부를 하고 있지 않은 듯 하면서도 어휘를 공부할 수 있는 

효과를 노릴 수 있답니다. 

이미 배웠던 어휘들을 잘 기억하고 있는지 확인하기에도 유용한 게임이지요.

1. 게임 시작에 앞서 여러개의 어휘 묶음(단어 카드)을 준비해둡니다.

2.  클래스를 2팀으로 나누고, 칠판도 가운데에 선을 질러 두 칸으로 만듭니다.

3.  각 팀에서 학생 한 명을 뽑아서 펜(분필)을 준 후 단어 카드를 한 장 뽑도록 합니다.

4. 카드를 뽑은 학생은 칠판에다가 해당 단어를 그림으로 표현하고

나머지 팀원들은 그리는 그림이 무슨 단어를 뜻하는 것인지 맞춥니다. 

5. 먼저 정답을 외치는 팀이 포인트를 획득하게 됩니다.

6. 모든 학생들에게 그림 그릴 기회가 돌아가도록 게임을 계속 진행합니다. 

포인트를 얻기 위해서는 스피드가 필요하기 때문에

아이들의 긴박감을 가지고 게임에 참여해요.

반 성격에 따라 포인트에 울고 불고 하는 사태가 벌어질 수도 있으니

선생님 재량껏 수업을 이끌어가시면 될 것 같습니다. ^^